exams2025-03-19T21:15:20+00:00
SAP P_SAPEA_2023 Practice Exams
Last updated on Mar 31,2025- Exam Code: P_SAPEA_2023
- Exam Name: SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect
- Certification Provider: SAP
- Latest update: Mar 31,2025
Question #45
You want to add a comment to March 2020 as shown in the following visualization.
You have the following sets in a Tableau workbook
• Top N Customers
• Customers of 2020
• Top N Products
• Sellers of 2020
Which two sets can you combine? Choose two
- A . Sellers of 2020
- B . Customers of 2020
- C . Top N Products
- D . Top N Customers
Correct Answer: BD
BD
Explanation:
To combine two sets, they must have at least one dimension in common. In this case, Customers of 2020 and Top N Customers both have Customer Name as a dimension, so they can be combined using set operations such as union, intersection, or difference. Sellers of 2020 and Top N Products have different dimensions (Seller Name and Product Name), so they cannot be combined.
Reference:
https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/sets.htm
https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/sets_create.htm#combine-sets
BD
Explanation:
To combine two sets, they must have at least one dimension in common. In this case, Customers of 2020 and Top N Customers both have Customer Name as a dimension, so they can be combined using set operations such as union, intersection, or difference. Sellers of 2020 and Top N Products have different dimensions (Seller Name and Product Name), so they cannot be combined.
Reference:
https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/sets.htm
https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/sets_create.htm#combine-sets
Question #2
Define revenue streams and cost structure.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
According to the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which is a tool that helps entrepreneurs to design and communicate their business models in a sustainable way, the recommended sequence of steps is:
Assess and define the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment. This step involves defining and describing the products or services that Green Elk & Company offers to its target customers, and how they create value for them. The value propositions should address the needs, problems, or desires of the customers, and highlight the benefits or advantages of Green Elk & Company’s solutions over the alternatives.
Detail the customer relationships and channels. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company interacts with its customers, and how it reaches and delivers its products or services to them. The customer relationships should reflect the type and level of engagement that Green Elk & Company wants to establish and maintain with its customers, such as self-service, personal assistance, or community. The channels should reflect the most effective and efficient ways to communicate and distribute Green Elk & Company’s value propositions to its customers, such as online platforms, physical stores, or partners.
Identify relevant key activities, key resources, and partners. This step involves identifying and describing the main activities, resources, and partners that Green Elk & Company needs to perform and leverage to create and deliver its value propositions to its customers. The key activities should reflect the most important tasks or processes that Green Elk & Company undertakes to execute its business model, such as production, marketing, or sales. The key resources should reflect the most essential assets or inputs that Green Elk & Company requires to execute its business model, such as human, physical, financial, or intellectual resources. The key partners should reflect the most strategic relationships or collaborations that Green Elk & Company establishes with other entities to execute its business model, such as suppliers, distributors, or competitors.
Define the revenue streams and cost structure. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company generates income from its customers, and how much it spends to execute its business model. The revenue streams should reflect the sources and mechanisms of income that Green Elk & Company obtains from selling its products or services to its customers, such as sales, subscriptions, or fees. The cost structure should reflect the types and amounts of expenses that Green Elk & Company incurs to execute its business model, such as fixed costs, variable costs, or economies of scale.
Define the eco-social benefits and costs. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company contributes to or affects the environment and society through its business model. The eco-social benefits should reflect the positive impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company creates for the environment and society through its products or services, such as reducing emissions, improving health, or enhancing education. The eco-social costs should reflect the negative impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company causes for the environment and society through its products or services, such as increasing waste, depleting resources, or harming biodiversity.
The other options (A, B, D) are not correct for the sequence of steps to apply the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in this tool. For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is a crucial step to understand and communicate how Green Elk & Company creates value for its customers. It also suggests defining the cost structure and revenue streams before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former.
Option B is not correct because it does not include identifying relevant key activities, key resources, and partners, which are important aspects of executing a business model. It also suggests retrieving the documentation for the solutions that need to be integrated instead of assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is not relevant for designing a new business model.
Option D is not correct because it suggests assessing and defining the eco-social costs and benefits before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former. It also does not include detailing the customer relationships and channels, which are important aspects of delivering value to customers.
For more information on the Sustainable Business Model Canvas and its steps, you can refer to The Sustainable Business Canvas or Sustainable Business Model Canvas: A Review And Framework Development.
Explanation:
According to the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which is a tool that helps entrepreneurs to design and communicate their business models in a sustainable way, the recommended sequence of steps is:
Assess and define the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment. This step involves defining and describing the products or services that Green Elk & Company offers to its target customers, and how they create value for them. The value propositions should address the needs, problems, or desires of the customers, and highlight the benefits or advantages of Green Elk & Company’s solutions over the alternatives.
Detail the customer relationships and channels. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company interacts with its customers, and how it reaches and delivers its products or services to them. The customer relationships should reflect the type and level of engagement that Green Elk & Company wants to establish and maintain with its customers, such as self-service, personal assistance, or community. The channels should reflect the most effective and efficient ways to communicate and distribute Green Elk & Company’s value propositions to its customers, such as online platforms, physical stores, or partners.
Identify relevant key activities, key resources, and partners. This step involves identifying and describing the main activities, resources, and partners that Green Elk & Company needs to perform and leverage to create and deliver its value propositions to its customers. The key activities should reflect the most important tasks or processes that Green Elk & Company undertakes to execute its business model, such as production, marketing, or sales. The key resources should reflect the most essential assets or inputs that Green Elk & Company requires to execute its business model, such as human, physical, financial, or intellectual resources. The key partners should reflect the most strategic relationships or collaborations that Green Elk & Company establishes with other entities to execute its business model, such as suppliers, distributors, or competitors.
Define the revenue streams and cost structure. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company generates income from its customers, and how much it spends to execute its business model. The revenue streams should reflect the sources and mechanisms of income that Green Elk & Company obtains from selling its products or services to its customers, such as sales, subscriptions, or fees. The cost structure should reflect the types and amounts of expenses that Green Elk & Company incurs to execute its business model, such as fixed costs, variable costs, or economies of scale.
Define the eco-social benefits and costs. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company contributes to or affects the environment and society through its business model. The eco-social benefits should reflect the positive impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company creates for the environment and society through its products or services, such as reducing emissions, improving health, or enhancing education. The eco-social costs should reflect the negative impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company causes for the environment and society through its products or services, such as increasing waste, depleting resources, or harming biodiversity.
The other options (A, B, D) are not correct for the sequence of steps to apply the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in this tool. For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is a crucial step to understand and communicate how Green Elk & Company creates value for its customers. It also suggests defining the cost structure and revenue streams before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former.
Option B is not correct because it does not include identifying relevant key activities, key resources, and partners, which are important aspects of executing a business model. It also suggests retrieving the documentation for the solutions that need to be integrated instead of assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is not relevant for designing a new business model.
Option D is not correct because it suggests assessing and defining the eco-social costs and benefits before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former. It also does not include detailing the customer relationships and channels, which are important aspects of delivering value to customers.
For more information on the Sustainable Business Model Canvas and its steps, you can refer to The Sustainable Business Canvas or Sustainable Business Model Canvas: A Review And Framework Development.
Question #2
Define revenue streams and cost structure.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
According to the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which is a tool that helps entrepreneurs to design and communicate their business models in a sustainable way, the recommended sequence of steps is:
Assess and define the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment. This step involves defining and describing the products or services that Green Elk & Company offers to its target customers, and how they create value for them. The value propositions should address the needs, problems, or desires of the customers, and highlight the benefits or advantages of Green Elk & Company’s solutions over the alternatives.
Detail the customer relationships and channels. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company interacts with its customers, and how it reaches and delivers its products or services to them. The customer relationships should reflect the type and level of engagement that Green Elk & Company wants to establish and maintain with its customers, such as self-service, personal assistance, or community. The channels should reflect the most effective and efficient ways to communicate and distribute Green Elk & Company’s value propositions to its customers, such as online platforms, physical stores, or partners.
Identify relevant key activities, key resources, and partners. This step involves identifying and describing the main activities, resources, and partners that Green Elk & Company needs to perform and leverage to create and deliver its value propositions to its customers. The key activities should reflect the most important tasks or processes that Green Elk & Company undertakes to execute its business model, such as production, marketing, or sales. The key resources should reflect the most essential assets or inputs that Green Elk & Company requires to execute its business model, such as human, physical, financial, or intellectual resources. The key partners should reflect the most strategic relationships or collaborations that Green Elk & Company establishes with other entities to execute its business model, such as suppliers, distributors, or competitors.
Define the revenue streams and cost structure. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company generates income from its customers, and how much it spends to execute its business model. The revenue streams should reflect the sources and mechanisms of income that Green Elk & Company obtains from selling its products or services to its customers, such as sales, subscriptions, or fees. The cost structure should reflect the types and amounts of expenses that Green Elk & Company incurs to execute its business model, such as fixed costs, variable costs, or economies of scale.
Define the eco-social benefits and costs. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company contributes to or affects the environment and society through its business model. The eco-social benefits should reflect the positive impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company creates for the environment and society through its products or services, such as reducing emissions, improving health, or enhancing education. The eco-social costs should reflect the negative impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company causes for the environment and society through its products or services, such as increasing waste, depleting resources, or harming biodiversity.
The other options (A, B, D) are not correct for the sequence of steps to apply the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in this tool. For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is a crucial step to understand and communicate how Green Elk & Company creates value for its customers. It also suggests defining the cost structure and revenue streams before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former.
Option B is not correct because it does not include identifying relevant key activities, key resources, and partners, which are important aspects of executing a business model. It also suggests retrieving the documentation for the solutions that need to be integrated instead of assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is not relevant for designing a new business model.
Option D is not correct because it suggests assessing and defining the eco-social costs and benefits before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former. It also does not include detailing the customer relationships and channels, which are important aspects of delivering value to customers.
For more information on the Sustainable Business Model Canvas and its steps, you can refer to The Sustainable Business Canvas or Sustainable Business Model Canvas: A Review And Framework Development.
Explanation:
According to the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which is a tool that helps entrepreneurs to design and communicate their business models in a sustainable way, the recommended sequence of steps is:
Assess and define the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment. This step involves defining and describing the products or services that Green Elk & Company offers to its target customers, and how they create value for them. The value propositions should address the needs, problems, or desires of the customers, and highlight the benefits or advantages of Green Elk & Company’s solutions over the alternatives.
Detail the customer relationships and channels. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company interacts with its customers, and how it reaches and delivers its products or services to them. The customer relationships should reflect the type and level of engagement that Green Elk & Company wants to establish and maintain with its customers, such as self-service, personal assistance, or community. The channels should reflect the most effective and efficient ways to communicate and distribute Green Elk & Company’s value propositions to its customers, such as online platforms, physical stores, or partners.
Identify relevant key activities, key resources, and partners. This step involves identifying and describing the main activities, resources, and partners that Green Elk & Company needs to perform and leverage to create and deliver its value propositions to its customers. The key activities should reflect the most important tasks or processes that Green Elk & Company undertakes to execute its business model, such as production, marketing, or sales. The key resources should reflect the most essential assets or inputs that Green Elk & Company requires to execute its business model, such as human, physical, financial, or intellectual resources. The key partners should reflect the most strategic relationships or collaborations that Green Elk & Company establishes with other entities to execute its business model, such as suppliers, distributors, or competitors.
Define the revenue streams and cost structure. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company generates income from its customers, and how much it spends to execute its business model. The revenue streams should reflect the sources and mechanisms of income that Green Elk & Company obtains from selling its products or services to its customers, such as sales, subscriptions, or fees. The cost structure should reflect the types and amounts of expenses that Green Elk & Company incurs to execute its business model, such as fixed costs, variable costs, or economies of scale.
Define the eco-social benefits and costs. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company contributes to or affects the environment and society through its business model. The eco-social benefits should reflect the positive impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company creates for the environment and society through its products or services, such as reducing emissions, improving health, or enhancing education. The eco-social costs should reflect the negative impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company causes for the environment and society through its products or services, such as increasing waste, depleting resources, or harming biodiversity.
The other options (A, B, D) are not correct for the sequence of steps to apply the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in this tool. For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is a crucial step to understand and communicate how Green Elk & Company creates value for its customers. It also suggests defining the cost structure and revenue streams before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former.
Option B is not correct because it does not include identifying relevant key activities, key resources, and partners, which are important aspects of executing a business model. It also suggests retrieving the documentation for the solutions that need to be integrated instead of assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is not relevant for designing a new business model.
Option D is not correct because it suggests assessing and defining the eco-social costs and benefits before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former. It also does not include detailing the customer relationships and channels, which are important aspects of delivering value to customers.
For more information on the Sustainable Business Model Canvas and its steps, you can refer to The Sustainable Business Canvas or Sustainable Business Model Canvas: A Review And Framework Development.
Question #4
Define the eco-social benefits and costs.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
According to the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which is a tool that helps entrepreneurs to design and communicate their business models in a sustainable way, the recommended sequence of steps is:
Assess and define the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment. This step involves defining and describing the products or services that Green Elk & Company offers to its target customers, and how they create value for them. The value propositions should address the needs, problems, or desires of the customers, and highlight the benefits or advantages of Green Elk & Company’s solutions over the alternatives.
Detail the customer relationships and channels. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company interacts with its customers, and how it reaches and delivers its products or services to them. The customer relationships should reflect the type and level of engagement that Green Elk
& Company wants to establish and maintain with its customers, such as self-service, personal assistance, or community. The channels should reflect the most effective and efficient ways to communicate and distribute Green Elk & Company’s value propositions to its customers, such as online platforms, physical stores, or partners.
Identify relevant key activities, key resources, and partners. This step involves identifying and describing the main activities, resources, and partners that Green Elk & Company needs to perform and leverage to create and deliver its value propositions to its customers. The key activities should reflect the most important tasks or processes that Green Elk & Company undertakes to execute its business model, such as production, marketing, or sales. The key resources should reflect the most essential assets or inputs that Green Elk & Company requires to execute its business model, such as human, physical, financial, or intellectual resources. The key partners should reflect the most strategic relationships or collaborations that Green Elk & Company establishes with other entities to execute its business model, such as suppliers, distributors, or competitors.
Define the revenue streams and cost structure. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company generates income from its customers, and how much it spends to execute its business model. The revenue streams should reflect the sources and mechanisms of income that Green Elk & Company obtains from selling its products or services to its customers, such as sales, subscriptions, or fees. The cost structure should reflect the types and amounts of expenses that Green Elk & Company incurs to execute its business model, such as fixed costs, variable costs, or economies of scale.
Define the eco-social benefits and costs. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company contributes to or affects the environment and society through its business model. The eco-social benefits should reflect the positive impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company creates
for the environment and society through its products or services, such as reducing emissions, improving health, or enhancing education. The eco-social costs should reflect the negative impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company causes for the environment and society through its products or services, such as increasing waste, depleting resources, or harming biodiversity.
The other options (A and B) are not correct for the sequence of steps to apply the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in this tool. For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is a crucial step to understand and communicate how Green Elk & Company creates value for its customers. It also suggests defining the cost structure and revenue streams before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former.
Option B is not correct because it does not include identifying relevant key activities, key resources, and partners, which are important aspects of executing a business model. It also suggests retrieving the documentation for the solutions that need to be integrated instead of assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is not relevant for designing a new business model.
For more information on the Sustainable Business Model Canvas and its steps, you can refer to The Sustainable Business Canvas or Sustainable Business Model Canvas: A Review And Framework Development.
Explanation:
According to the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, which is a tool that helps entrepreneurs to design and communicate their business models in a sustainable way, the recommended sequence of steps is:
Assess and define the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment. This step involves defining and describing the products or services that Green Elk & Company offers to its target customers, and how they create value for them. The value propositions should address the needs, problems, or desires of the customers, and highlight the benefits or advantages of Green Elk & Company’s solutions over the alternatives.
Detail the customer relationships and channels. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company interacts with its customers, and how it reaches and delivers its products or services to them. The customer relationships should reflect the type and level of engagement that Green Elk
& Company wants to establish and maintain with its customers, such as self-service, personal assistance, or community. The channels should reflect the most effective and efficient ways to communicate and distribute Green Elk & Company’s value propositions to its customers, such as online platforms, physical stores, or partners.
Identify relevant key activities, key resources, and partners. This step involves identifying and describing the main activities, resources, and partners that Green Elk & Company needs to perform and leverage to create and deliver its value propositions to its customers. The key activities should reflect the most important tasks or processes that Green Elk & Company undertakes to execute its business model, such as production, marketing, or sales. The key resources should reflect the most essential assets or inputs that Green Elk & Company requires to execute its business model, such as human, physical, financial, or intellectual resources. The key partners should reflect the most strategic relationships or collaborations that Green Elk & Company establishes with other entities to execute its business model, such as suppliers, distributors, or competitors.
Define the revenue streams and cost structure. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company generates income from its customers, and how much it spends to execute its business model. The revenue streams should reflect the sources and mechanisms of income that Green Elk & Company obtains from selling its products or services to its customers, such as sales, subscriptions, or fees. The cost structure should reflect the types and amounts of expenses that Green Elk & Company incurs to execute its business model, such as fixed costs, variable costs, or economies of scale.
Define the eco-social benefits and costs. This step involves defining and describing how Green Elk & Company contributes to or affects the environment and society through its business model. The eco-social benefits should reflect the positive impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company creates
for the environment and society through its products or services, such as reducing emissions, improving health, or enhancing education. The eco-social costs should reflect the negative impacts or externalities that Green Elk & Company causes for the environment and society through its products or services, such as increasing waste, depleting resources, or harming biodiversity.
The other options (A and B) are not correct for the sequence of steps to apply the Sustainable Business Model Canvas, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in this tool. For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is a crucial step to understand and communicate how Green Elk & Company creates value for its customers. It also suggests defining the cost structure and revenue streams before defining the customer segments and value propositions, which is not a logical order since the latter determine the former.
Option B is not correct because it does not include identifying relevant key activities, key resources, and partners, which are important aspects of executing a business model. It also suggests retrieving the documentation for the solutions that need to be integrated instead of assessing and defining the value propositions for the small size farms customer segment, which is not relevant for designing a new business model.
For more information on the Sustainable Business Model Canvas and its steps, you can refer to The Sustainable Business Canvas or Sustainable Business Model Canvas: A Review And Framework Development.
Question #5
Which artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture shows which data objects are exchanged between SAP application components in a given end-to-end scenario?
- A . SAP Data Object Diagram, which is available from SAP API Business Accelerator Hub (api.sap.com)
- B . SAP Data Flow Diagram, which is available from SAP API Business Accelerator Hub (api sap.com)
- C . SAP Data Component Diagram, which is available in SAP Signavio Process Explorer
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
The SAP Data Flow Diagram (DFD) is an artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture that shows which data objects are exchanged between SAP application components in a given end-to-end scenario. The DFD uses a graphical representation to show the flow of data between different components of a system.
The SAP Data Object Diagram (DOD) is also an artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture, but it does not show the flow of data between different components. The DOD shows the structure of data objects, including their attributes and relationships.
The SAP Data Component Diagram (DCD) is an artifact from SAP Signavio Process Explorer, which is a tool for modeling business processes. The DCD shows the different components of a system, including their relationships.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
Here is a table that summarizes the different artifacts and their purposes:
B
Explanation:
The SAP Data Flow Diagram (DFD) is an artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture that shows which data objects are exchanged between SAP application components in a given end-to-end scenario. The DFD uses a graphical representation to show the flow of data between different components of a system.
The SAP Data Object Diagram (DOD) is also an artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture, but it does not show the flow of data between different components. The DOD shows the structure of data objects, including their attributes and relationships.
The SAP Data Component Diagram (DCD) is an artifact from SAP Signavio Process Explorer, which is a tool for modeling business processes. The DCD shows the different components of a system, including their relationships.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
Here is a table that summarizes the different artifacts and their purposes:
According to the SAP Reference Architecture Content: An Overview C Part 2, the SAP Data Flow Diagram is an artifact that shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination. It also shows which data objects are exchanged between the different components and services of the SAP solution, such as master data, transactional data, analytical data, or configuration data. The SAP Data Flow Diagram can help you to understand and communicate how data is created, transformed, and consumed in a SAP solution, and to identify and optimize the data integration points and dependencies.
The other options (A and C) are not correct for the artifact from the SAP Reference Solution Architecture that shows which data objects are exchanged between SAP application components in a given end-to-end scenario, because they either do not exist or do not show the data flow. For example:
Option A is not correct because there is no such artifact as SAP Data Object Diagram in the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content. The SAP API Business Accelerator Hub (api.sap.com) is a platform that provides access to SAP APIs, events, and related resources, but it does not provide any diagrams that show the data objects exchanged between SAP application components.
Option C is not correct because the SAP Data Component Diagram is not an artifact that shows the data flow, but rather an artifact that shows the main components and services that constitute the target application architecture, as well as their relationships and interactions. The SAP Data Component Diagram does not show which data objects are exchanged between the different components and services of the SAP solution. The SAP Signavio Process Explorer is a tool that helps you to model, analyze, and optimize business processes, but it does not provide any diagrams that show the data flow.
Question #6
Which of the following set of artifacts does SAP provide as part of the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content?
- A . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
- B . Solution Context Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Application Use-Case Diagram/Solution Value Flow Diagram.
- C . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
Question #6
Which of the following set of artifacts does SAP provide as part of the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content?
- A . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
- B . Solution Context Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Application Use-Case Diagram/Solution Value Flow Diagram.
- C . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
Question #6
Which of the following set of artifacts does SAP provide as part of the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content?
- A . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
- B . Solution Context Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Application Use-Case Diagram/Solution Value Flow Diagram.
- C . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
Question #6
Which of the following set of artifacts does SAP provide as part of the SAP Reference Solution Architecture content?
- A . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
- B . Solution Context Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Application Use-Case Diagram/Solution Value Flow Diagram.
- C . Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
A
Explanation:
The answer is A. Solution Value Flow Diagram/Solution Process Flow Diagram/Solution Component Diagram/Solution Data Flow Diagram.
The SAP Reference Solution Architecture (RSA) content provides a set of artifacts that can be used to describe the solution architecture for a SAP solution.
These artifacts include:
Solution Value Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of value through the solution, from the customer to the back-end systems.
Solution Process Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the detailed steps involved in a business process, and how the SAP solution supports those steps.
Solution Component Diagram – This diagram shows the different components of the SAP solution, and how they interact with each other.
Solution Data Flow Diagram – This diagram shows the flow of data through the SAP solution, from the source to the destination.
These artifacts can be used to understand the solution architecture for a SAP solution, and to communicate that architecture to others.
Question #10
Enable a Practice of Empowerment.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
The best answer for the integration approach to take for this solution is C. According to the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M), which is a methodology offered by SAP that helps enterprise architects define an integration strategy for their organizations and derive related integration guidelines, the recommended approach for identifying an integration solution and strategy is:
Document and review the existing integration (architecture). This step involves documenting and analyzing the current state of the integration landscape, including the integration scenarios, technologies, patterns, standards, and governance processes. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the existing integration (architecture) and identify the gaps and improvement areas.
Scope focus areas, for example future required building blocks. This step involves defining and prioritizing the focus areas for the integration project, such as new or changed business requirements, integration scenarios, or technologies. The focus areas are derived from the gaps and improvement areas identified in the previous step, as well as from the business goals and drivers of the organization. The focus areas are also mapped to future required building blocks, which are logical components that represent the desired capabilities or functionalities of the integration solution.
Identify architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns). This step involves identifying and describing the use-cases that are relevant for the integration project, such as process integration, data integration, user integration, or thing integration. The use-cases are technology agnostic, meaning that they do not specify any particular technology or service for implementation. The use-cases are also clustered in use-case patterns, which are generic templates that capture the common characteristics and requirements of similar use-cases.
Map these use case patterns to integration technology. This step involves mapping the use-case patterns to suitable integration technologies or services that can implement them. The mapping is based on a set of criteria and decision tables that consider various aspects of the use-case patterns, such as complexity, performance, security, or scalability. The mapping also takes into account the existing or planned integration technologies or services in the organization’s landscape.
Define Integration Best Practices. This step involves defining and documenting the best practices and guidelines for designing, developing, testing, deploying, monitoring, and governing the integration solutions. The best practices and guidelines are based on SAP’s recommendations and industry standards, as well as on the organization’s specific needs and preferences. The best practices and guidelines also cover various aspects of the integration project, such as naming conventions, error handling, logging, tracing, or versioning.
Enable a Practice of Empowerment. This step involves enabling and empowering the different roles and personas involved in the integration project, such as integration architects, developers, testers, operators, or business users. The goal is to foster a culture of collaboration and innovation among the stakeholders, and to provide them with the necessary skills, tools, and resources to execute their tasks effectively and efficiently.
The other options (A and B) are not correct for the integration approach to take for this solution, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M). For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include identifying architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns), which is a key step to define and categorize the integration requirements in a generic way. It also does not include enabling a practice of empowerment, which is a key step to ensure the success and sustainability of the integration project.
Option B is not correct because it does not include documenting and reviewing the existing integration (architecture), which is a key step to understand the current state of the integration landscape and identify the gaps and improvement areas. It also does not include scoping focus areas or mapping use case patterns to integration technology, which are key steps to define and prioritize the future state of the integration solution.
For more information on the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) and its steps, you can refer to SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology: Template version 4.0 available now | SAP Blogs or Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M): Define Integration Guidelines for Your Organization | SAP Blogs.
Explanation:
The best answer for the integration approach to take for this solution is C. According to the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M), which is a methodology offered by SAP that helps enterprise architects define an integration strategy for their organizations and derive related integration guidelines, the recommended approach for identifying an integration solution and strategy is:
Document and review the existing integration (architecture). This step involves documenting and analyzing the current state of the integration landscape, including the integration scenarios, technologies, patterns, standards, and governance processes. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the existing integration (architecture) and identify the gaps and improvement areas.
Scope focus areas, for example future required building blocks. This step involves defining and prioritizing the focus areas for the integration project, such as new or changed business requirements, integration scenarios, or technologies. The focus areas are derived from the gaps and improvement areas identified in the previous step, as well as from the business goals and drivers of the organization. The focus areas are also mapped to future required building blocks, which are logical components that represent the desired capabilities or functionalities of the integration solution.
Identify architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns). This step involves identifying and describing the use-cases that are relevant for the integration project, such as process integration, data integration, user integration, or thing integration. The use-cases are technology agnostic, meaning that they do not specify any particular technology or service for implementation. The use-cases are also clustered in use-case patterns, which are generic templates that capture the common characteristics and requirements of similar use-cases.
Map these use case patterns to integration technology. This step involves mapping the use-case patterns to suitable integration technologies or services that can implement them. The mapping is based on a set of criteria and decision tables that consider various aspects of the use-case patterns, such as complexity, performance, security, or scalability. The mapping also takes into account the existing or planned integration technologies or services in the organization’s landscape.
Define Integration Best Practices. This step involves defining and documenting the best practices and guidelines for designing, developing, testing, deploying, monitoring, and governing the integration solutions. The best practices and guidelines are based on SAP’s recommendations and industry standards, as well as on the organization’s specific needs and preferences. The best practices and guidelines also cover various aspects of the integration project, such as naming conventions, error handling, logging, tracing, or versioning.
Enable a Practice of Empowerment. This step involves enabling and empowering the different roles and personas involved in the integration project, such as integration architects, developers, testers, operators, or business users. The goal is to foster a culture of collaboration and innovation among the stakeholders, and to provide them with the necessary skills, tools, and resources to execute their tasks effectively and efficiently.
The other options (A and B) are not correct for the integration approach to take for this solution, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M). For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include identifying architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns), which is a key step to define and categorize the integration requirements in a generic way. It also does not include enabling a practice of empowerment, which is a key step to ensure the success and sustainability of the integration project.
Option B is not correct because it does not include documenting and reviewing the existing integration (architecture), which is a key step to understand the current state of the integration landscape and identify the gaps and improvement areas. It also does not include scoping focus areas or mapping use case patterns to integration technology, which are key steps to define and prioritize the future state of the integration solution.
For more information on the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) and its steps, you can refer to SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology: Template version 4.0 available now | SAP Blogs or Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M): Define Integration Guidelines for Your Organization | SAP Blogs.